Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald ★★★☆☆

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald ★★★☆☆
J. K. Rowling

Genre(s) | Fantasy, Young-Adult, Screenplay
Goodreads Rating | 4.28
Humpo Show Rating | 3.00 
Published: 2018
Publisher: Little, Brown

Gellert Grindelwald – a dark and powerful wizard – escapes from the authorities and sets about gathering followers with a vision for a pure-blood wizard rule. Newt Scamander somehow finds himself entrusted with the responsibility of finding the person that is central to Grindelwald’s plans for domination – Credence.

With any book or screenplay that Rowling puts her name to, there will always be hype. Crimes of Grindelwald is no different, and for me it falls quite far short of the standard she has set. There are too many sub-plots; a few issues with continuity; some poor decision-making from Rowling regarding the ending; and to be honest, the plot wasn’t entertaining.

The screenplay sees Newt reunite with Tina, Jacob and Queenie – although it is definitely not like last time. Queenie is a shadow of her former self that entranced everyone in Fantastic Beasts. Jacob is on the periphery and his lines that were meant to comedic, missed the mark entirely. The Tina-Newt ‘romance’ develops at a snail’s pace, and her Auror skills aren’t showcased very well at all. Newt, our main protagonist in Fantastic Beasts, didn’t feel much like a lead in this instalment as he shares the stage with Grindelwald, Credence, Leta Lestrange and Albus Dumbledore. What did I say about too many sub-plots…

Essentially, the whole story revolves around Credence’s identity. As the saying goes, “it’s the journey, not the destination”. Rowling misses the mark on both counts: the journey is tiresome and not exciting; while the destination is poorly chosen.

To speak of something positive – Rowling does manage to cement a personality for Grindelwald; his wants, desires and vision are all clear. On the whole, his speeches were consistent and evocative, which reflect his awesome power and capabilities. I can’t wait to see the special effects in the film that showcase off his magic.

I would have loved to have seen Newt and team having adventures around the world with a myriad of villains, beasts and stories. But alas, I can see Rowling continuing down the path she has set in this screenplay – and loyal Potterheads will continue to read the screenplays and watch the films in the hope that she eventually manages to recreate the magic she captured in the Potter series. I’m not holding my breath though.

The Humpo Show | Richard

10 thoughts on “Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald ★★★☆☆

  1. After seeing so many mixed reviews of this (and because they defended Johnny Depp!) I definitely think I’ll be waiting till this is free on Sky Movies rather than going to the cinema or purchasing it. I really quite liked the first film, mainly because I thought Eddie Redmayne was great, but I did find the plot a bit unwieldy I think, and from anything I’ve seen I’m genuinely struggling to understand what the plot of this one actually IS. Really enjoyed reading your review!
    Amy 💜

    • The first has some great moments like the niffler in the bank and when Jacob first goes into Newt’s case – plus there’s plenty of light relief. This one is darker but certainly not better. I had high hopes for this one as I like the title, and the fact that the story goes to Paris. I’ll still go to the cinema, but can’t see it being much of an improvement on the screenplay..

  2. Pingback: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald ★★★☆☆ |

  3. Pingback: Book Review: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald by J.K. Rowling (3/5) | Taking On a World of Words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.